Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31
  1. #11
    User
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    GP, but in my mind, hunting for Ivory in the 1930's
    Age
    43
    Posts
    6,262

    Default Re: Efficacy of a recoil pad.

    True, those European “pigs back” stock designs tend to have the worst felt recoil. A classic American strait comb works about the best, the rifle comes back at you and doesn’t rise to bite your cheek.
    Don’t take life too seriously, no one gets out alive.

  2. #12
    User
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Sandton
    Posts
    8,859

    Default Re: Efficacy of a recoil pad.

    Quote Originally Posted by CorditeCrazy View Post
    True, those European “pigs back” stock designs tend to have the worst felt recoil. A classic American strait comb works about the best, the rifle comes back at you and doesn’t rise to bite your cheek.
    What is the hump intended to do better?

  3. #13
    User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Age
    39
    Posts
    3,090

    Default Re: Efficacy of a recoil pad.

    Quote Originally Posted by oafpatroll View Post
    What is the hump intended to do better?
    Apparently provides better cheekweld, and enhances natural point of aim.

  4. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Age
    43
    Posts
    1,277

    Default Re: Efficacy of a recoil pad.

    Quote Originally Posted by Socrates View Post
    Apparently provides better cheekweld, and enhances natural point of aim.
    with open sights as I understand?

  5. #15
    User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Age
    39
    Posts
    3,090

    Default Re: Efficacy of a recoil pad.

    Quote Originally Posted by DaavG View Post
    with open sights as I understand?
    Maybe, but from what I've seen the Germans of days of yore mounted their scopes pretty high. So either they mounted it that high because of the hogs back stock, or they have a hogs back stock so they can see the scopes.

    Examples:

    https://www.egun.de/market/item.php?id=19480147

    https://www.egun.de/market/item.php?id=19269610

  6. #16
    User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pretoria, South Africa
    Age
    34
    Posts
    12,555

    Default Re: Efficacy of a recoil pad.

    I'll take anything I can get to make my rifle hurt me less, because that means I'll shoot better and end up hunting better.

  7. #17
    User
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Sandton
    Posts
    8,859

    Default Re: Efficacy of a recoil pad.

    Thanks for the explanations. I have shot a few with that style of stock and find them less pleasant to shoot and aesthetically unpleasing than a straight comb style.

  8. #18
    Member Andrew Leigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Gansbaai - Western Cape
    Posts
    7,351

    Default Re: Efficacy of a recoil pad.

    Quote Originally Posted by zguy View Post
    What's everyone's take on slip on pads? As effective as a fitted pad?
    Nope.

    Firstly, they alter your Length of Pull. This however may be a desired result.
    Secondly, they never hold tightly to the butt to maintain a consistent position, this will lead to increased inaccuracy.
    Finally, they just look real horrible on a rifle.
    One too many wasted sunsets and one too many for the road .........

  9. #19

    Default Re: Efficacy of a recoil pad.

    Quote Originally Posted by CorditeCrazy View Post
    True, those European “pigs back” stock designs tend to have the worst felt recoil. A classic American strait comb works about the best, the rifle comes back at you and doesn’t rise to bite your cheek.
    Interestingly, the nice-shooting rifle was a classic British-style (but made in Germany) with quite a lot of drop at the heel and a knife-edge comb. The bruiser was a much straighter stock.

  10. #20
    User
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Bryanston, JHB
    Age
    48
    Posts
    493

    Default Re: Efficacy of a recoil pad.

    Quote Originally Posted by Adie View Post
    It shouldn’t change the aesthetics should remain the Siam as it’s also a red pad. I also agree, I’d it makes a noticeable difference, it’s worth it. The question I have is, will it make one.
    Yes it will make a noticeable difference. I fitted one on my 416 Rigby. A mercury recoil reducer will make even more of a difference.

    The 450 Rigby in CZ guise is quite light (same profile barrel as 416, just with a bigger hole down the middle, hence lighter) and has a reputation for having a particularly nasty kick with the hogsback stock. It's worth adding/modding whatever makes sense to tame the recoil. Even with the straight American Safari stock, you won't regret minimizing the recoil.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •