Results 1 to 10 of 118
Thread: Why does san parks use the R1
-
19-02-2013, 14:23 #1
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Grahamstown
- Posts
- 745
Why does san parks use the R1
I was wondering why the field rangers use the R1 (7,62 x 51) opposed to the R4 (5.56 x 45)?
Is it because of the larger caliber or is it because they get free/cheap R1 from the defense force?
Regards,
Richard
-
19-02-2013, 14:29 #2
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 5,294
-
19-02-2013, 14:31 #3
Re: Why does san parks use the R1
And the fact that they might have to fend of attacks by things with claws!
Sent electronically, thus not signed.
-
19-02-2013, 14:31 #4
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- Strand
- Age
- 38
- Posts
- 10,408
Re: Why does san parks use the R1
Battle proven, hard-wearing, powerful cartridge, good long range accuracy.
I dunno, guess if it was good enough for the "Free World" once upon a time, it's good enough for the Rangers?
-
19-02-2013, 14:33 #5
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Location
- Pretoria, South Africa
- Age
- 34
- Posts
- 12,555
Re: Why does san parks use the R1
Whatever the reason, the only drawback I can find from using an R1 as opposed to an R4 is the extra weight. Higher bullet energy, larger caliber and insane stopping power is why I would like to use the R1 instead. Also, as h0stag3 said, the can shoot through a smaller tree and still kill the enemy behind it. And shooting a charging lion with a .223 is a tad worrying, I'd think.
-
19-02-2013, 14:59 #6
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Grahamstown
- Posts
- 745
Re: Why does san parks use the R1
I suppose other than its weight it probably holds the trump cards for use as an anti poaching weapon. It could in theory protect rangers from attacks from humans and animals alike, or at least better than a .223.
-
19-02-2013, 15:06 #7
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- I'm not from here, I was sent.
- Age
- 54
- Posts
- 5,510
Re: Why does san parks use the R1
Just to add to what has already been said above.
In many parts of parks like Kruger, the bush is seriously thick.
Many years ago when I was in the SADF in the Caprivi Strip, a mate and me did a non scientific test. He had been issued an R4 and I was still carrying an R1.
We camped out one night and did a test with tracers. As the bush was getting dark. You could still see a bit of backround sky but you could also see where the bush was nice and thick. We fired through these thick areas.
The 556 tracers often never went far in or they deflected wildly, almost at right angles. If they hit thick branches (3 or 4 inches in diameter or larger) they disapeared, captured by the branches.
The 762's were a different matters. They mostly penetrated for long distances with only minor or moderate course changes, only being captured by tree trunks.
If I was getting into a firefight in thick bush, I want the 762
SeanLast edited by Sean Murphy; 19-02-2013 at 15:08.
Pain is just weakness leaving the body.
-
19-02-2013, 15:07 #8
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Posts
- 4,975
Re: Why does san parks use the R1
Id rather shoot a big cat with a 30 caliber than a 22.
that being said I'd rather not shoot any cat at all.
-
19-02-2013, 15:10 #9
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- GP, but in my mind, hunting for Ivory in the 1930's
- Age
- 43
- Posts
- 6,262
Re: Why does san parks use the R1
I don't think weight will be a major issue, the rangers are not carrying the same volume ammo a soldier would, last time I was in the park the most I saw was 2 extra mags
-
19-02-2013, 15:13 #10
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Johannesburg
- Age
- 51
- Posts
- 3,103
Similar Threads
-
Carrying in National Parks
By Antlion in forum Firearms Legal IssuesReplies: 8Last Post: 28-09-2012, 17:41 -
Why We Shouldn't Fear an End to the Ban on Guns In National Parks
By SGB in forum General DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: 01-05-2010, 10:48
Bookmarks