Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 79
  1. #51
    User
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    /\/¯|||¯¯\/\
    Posts
    1,201

    Default Re: Digital Safes Shown to be Insecure

    I read through the SABS certificate that is supplied with the safe, and it appears (to me) that they only check the construction and that the safe complies with the law regarding metal thickness, etc.. No attempt to open it is made.

    I followed the supplied link to Makro and that safe is going for R2250 now. I'm pretty sure I didn't pay more than R1K.

    Mods don't shoot please: A certain local 4 wheel drive community forum had a similar thread. Can I post a link to it?
    Last edited by dux; 25-09-2014 at 11:03.

  2. #52
    User
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Western Cape, Cape Town
    Age
    41
    Posts
    2,475

    Default Re: Digital Safes Shown to be Insecure

    Quote Originally Posted by h0stag3 View Post
    www.gunsite.co.za/forums/showthread.php?53227-Yale-Handgun-Safe-issue&p=733652#post733652

    For the guys who have these. Let's get a whole bunch of us complaining and hopefully something can be done about this.
    Think this is your best course of action.

    Really pisses me off, this is what gives a lot of electronic products (especially electronic security products) a bad name. If they just use a stepper motor instead of a solenoid this design can work.

  3. #53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dux View Post
    I read through the SABS certificate that is supplied with the safe, and it appears (to me) that they only check the construction and that the safe complies with the law regarding metal thickness, etc.. No attempt to open it is made.

    I followed the supplied link to Makro and that safe is going for R2250 now. I'm pretty sure I didn't pay more than R1K.

    Mods don't shoot please: A certain local 4 wheel drive community forum had a similar thread. Can I post a link to it?
    I think the more we can get with this concern, the harder the manufacturer must listen :-).

    These safes were primarily designed for guns and ammunition. Very restricted property IMO. How do you explain to the police that your guns and ammunition are missing and that all that is wrong with the safe is possibly some paint that is off at the top or whatnot...

    You WILL have a tough time explaining this I am sure.

    Similar to when stuff gets stolen from your car because the signal was jammed. How will you convince them that it was not negligence and that your safe was locked?

  4. #54
    User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    4,439

    Default Re: Digital Safes Shown to be Insecure

    Quote Originally Posted by dux View Post
    haha, here's a couple of pics of the assembled internals.

    Locked:


    Unlocked:

    Mounting this safe under a shelf will not protect you.

    If you break the front cover off, you can pull those blue wires through the slot for the ribbon and put a power source on them to energize the solenoid.

  5. #55

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gleock View Post
    Mounting this safe under a shelf will not protect you.

    If you break the front cover off, you can pull those blue wires through the slot for the ribbon and put a power source on them to energize the solenoid.
    With effort, DIY conduit and glue one could sort this problem out. Good point though!

  6. #56
    User
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Durban
    Posts
    916

    Default Re: Digital Safes Shown to be Insecure

    The batteries leaked in my Yale electronic handgun safe (same as the one being discussed), and the locksmith that came to open it took about 5 minutes to open it with a hammer and a screwdriver. I subsequently have just kept it as a decoy safe and moved on to other safes.

    lithium.

  7. #57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lithium View Post
    The batteries leaked in my Yale electronic handgun safe (same as the one being discussed), and the locksmith that came to open it took about 5 minutes to open it with a hammer and a screwdriver. I subsequently have just kept it as a decoy safe and moved on to other safes.

    lithium.
    Do you think it was because of this weakness? (5 minutes)

    Either way, Yale should be confronted about this.

  8. #58
    User
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    4,563

    Default Re: Digital Safes Shown to be Insecure

    from the pictures dux gave of the pin/solenoid assembly, it looks to me a stronger spring will overcome the issue, but not too strong the solenoid won't be able to operate it.

  9. #59
    User
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    JHB West Rand Gauteng
    Posts
    92

    Default Re: Digital Safes Shown to be Insecure

    If a servo type motor was used instead of the solenoid then the bump method would be eliminated .

  10. #60
    User
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    4,563

    Default Re: Digital Safes Shown to be Insecure

    Or install the safe upside down?

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Digital safes
    By PCfanatic in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-01-2015, 11:53
  2. A Society of the Emotionally Insecure
    By LocknLoad in forum Gun Free South Africa - The Truth
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27-05-2013, 19:27
  3. Got shown how to shoot my M&P 15-22 today.
    By Kayback in forum AR Discussions
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 15-05-2013, 08:14
  4. The 21' knife rule demo'd - with other distances and reactions shown
    By ARM505 in forum Firearms, Accessories and Related Equipment Video Clips
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 29-04-2013, 11:53

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •