Bizarre SAPS Procedure

**shooty** · 19-04-2017, 12:51

Originally Posted by griffin

Always 3 sides to a story.

Not always. Ive found sometimes there is even more then 3.

**Porramedic** · 19-04-2017, 14:10

Originally Posted by A-R

Would be very interesting to see how they try to prove that...

The account given describes a very close encounter. If that was the case, it will be supported by a lot of ballistic evidence on the deceased

**Marc05** · 19-04-2017, 19:07

Any info regarding court appearance?

**FNC** · 19-04-2017, 20:37

Originally Posted by DirkB

I just heard an interesting story. Apparently the police suspect he was shot while climbing over the wall and not where they said it happened. That is apparently why he was arrested. Interesting...

Sent from my BV6000 using Tapatalk

So..., did the intruder stab the shooter from the other side of the wall?

**Lian** · 19-04-2017, 21:02

Originally Posted by FNC

So..., did the intruder stab the shooter from the other side of the wall?

running away = threat has stopped
if the rumour is true... he might be in a lot of trouble.

**Knoffel** · 19-04-2017, 21:17

Originally Posted by G33

Blood splat.. bullet trajectory?

The lack of evidence that he was ever on thier side?

This does make for a very interesting read.

Sent from my SpaceCraft using MindControl!

Bullet trajectory is very hard to lay down as fact if you don't know precisely where the person was, or where the other person was standing. Same deal with entrance wounds - turn your body whichever way and you can completely twist the possible bullet trajectory.

But yeah, it does change things a little. Proving it however, is a thing the State will have to worry about.

**G33** · 19-04-2017, 21:20

Originally Posted by Knoffel

Bullet trajectory is very hard to lay down as fact if you don't know precisely where the person was, or where the other person was standing. Same deal with entrance wounds - turn your body whichever way and you can completely twist the possible bullet trajectory.

But yeah, it does change things a little. Proving it however, is a thing the State will have to worry about.

I know but all 3 could create enough doubt in a story...

I hope they come out with more info.

Sent from my SpaceCraft using MindControl!

**DirkB** · 19-04-2017, 22:39

The attacker was shot in the chest, no doubt because there was no exit wound. I'm not sure if the police think evidence was planted, I don't know but if what happened is what he described there should be blood where he was attacked, it was apparently a deep, nasty wound. So this should corroborate his version of the shooting.

He appeared in court and was released, not sure if on bail?! Anyway, will keep you up to date, there should be news soon.

Sent from my BV6000 using Tapatalk

**Lian** · 19-04-2017, 23:30

It would be pretty impressive running away and/or climbing a wall.... and getting shot in the chest (front).

**DirkB** · 20-04-2017, 06:15

Originally Posted by Lian

It would be pretty impressive running away and/or climbing a wall.... and getting shot in the chest (front).

Apparently they think he got shot while climbing over the wall to enter and fell backwards which is still very unlikely because he (the grandson) doesn't live there and there is proof that he was called there after his grandmother saw someone in her yard. Guilty until proven innocent I guess. I still don't understand why they took all his other weapons though.

Sent from my BV6000 using Tapatalk