If y'all aren't scared yet...

**Springer** · 11-07-2017, 16:19

Originally Posted by Manservant

No. It is fantastic. They have torn off all masks and attempts at obfuscating their intentions. We see them for what they are now. And hopefully so does the CC.

I can tell, you're a glass half full kind of guy...

**Gunservant** · 11-07-2017, 16:21

Originally Posted by Springer

I can tell, you're a glass half full kind of guy...

I have this weird, sneaky suspicion on this one...

**Hoodlum** · 11-07-2017, 16:28

Originally Posted by Manservant

I have this weird, sneaky suspicion on this one...

We pray you are right on this one bud!!

**Bimini** · 11-07-2017, 17:21

Originally Posted by Paul

“and is a legitimate exercise of power because it’s purpose is to protect health, welfare, safety and security for everyone’s benefit"

Because the moment your legal license expires you turn into a threat to society and is a threat to everyone around you!!!

Oh and the only way to solve this is to immediately disarm you!

**Graham12** · 11-07-2017, 17:36

When I forget to renew my car licence (have done it before), my car is not confiscated.....

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

**Acajou** · 11-07-2017, 17:41

Originally Posted by Graham12

When I forget to renew my car licence (have done it before), my car is not confiscated.....

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Cars never kill anyone, and unfit drivers pose no threat to public safety and health...

**SSP** · 11-07-2017, 18:29

Originally Posted by Graham12

When I forget to renew my car licence (have done it before), my car is not confiscated.....

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

The analogy is, of course, flawed.

One does not need a driver's licence or even a licence disk to own or possess a car - merely to drive on a public road.

**G33** · 11-07-2017, 18:32

Originally Posted by shooty

One of my friends who owns a dealership in CPT area. Who's bookkeeping I do. Has told me that the DFO who does his inspections have told him. That he has received instruction to carry on as normal. Nothing has changed due to ruling regarding anything at SAPS.

He told me this. I can not confirm if its true. Maybe someone else also with reasonable contacts to DFO's can maybe comment if they have heard similar.

As this will in fact be against current court ruling.

Carry on till further notice.

Sent from my SpaceCraft using MindControl!

**madhatter** · 11-07-2017, 18:35

Originally Posted by SSP

The analogy is, of course, flawed.

One does not need a driver's licence or even a licence disk to own or possess a car - merely to drive on a public road.

A firearm is still property, sometimes of considerable value.

Confiscation without remuneration is still unconstitutional.

**Graham12** · 11-07-2017, 18:45

Originally Posted by SSP

The analogy is, of course, flawed.

One does not need a driver's licence or even a licence disk to own or possess a car - merely to drive on a public road.

Agreed. My point is that with an expired vehicle licence one is given 30 days grace to relicense. Further, after that period, the driver is fined for driving on a public road without a valid licence. Thereafter I'm a little fuzzy as to the procedure for repeated infractions.

Why is the same thought pattern not applied here?

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk