Results 21 to 26 of 26
-
27-09-2018, 11:15 #21
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Age
- 33
- Posts
- 71
Re: Security industry regulator concerned about ‘warzone’ firearms
Not even 223. The 222 is was directly developed where the 556 and by extension 223 are banned due to being military calibres. Although in the greater scheme of the comments made by the PSIRA this seems an irrelevant talking point.
Sent from my Redmi 4A using Tapatalk
-
27-09-2018, 14:32 #22
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Location
- The moral high-ground
- Age
- 52
- Posts
- 3,001
Re: Security industry regulator concerned about ‘warzone’ firearms
I don't think we should give the talking head from PSIRA too much credit for his ability to express in the spoken word, what his mind thinks are "military type weapons" / assault rifles. I am willing to bet good money this retard would not know or be able to guess the difference between .22WMR and .375 H&H.
He most likely meant to say "military type weapons" but his brain excreted "calibres" instead because he is a dumbfuck.
-
27-09-2018, 18:07 #23
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Location
- South Africa
- Posts
- 4,475
-
28-09-2018, 19:13 #24
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Location
- Howick
- Posts
- 256
-
28-09-2018, 22:43 #25
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Age
- 33
- Posts
- 71
-
28-09-2018, 23:28 #26
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Location
- Howick
- Posts
- 256
For sure, that is probably what has kept the trip two from disappearing into history. There are calibers though, that came into being as a result of bans, or restrictions on military calibres. The 470 NE and 8x60 come to mind.
I know we assume military style weapons was what was meant. But if the powers that be, passed such a ban on military calibers, then beside those already mentioned, there are a few that might end up in a grey area of such a law. Even popular hunting calibres like 300 Winchester Magnum and 22-250 have been used in military applications.
Bookmarks