Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32
  1. #21
    Moderator Skaaphaas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Elsewhere
    Posts
    18,528

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cockroach View Post
    As I understand it too.

    And to be an airgun it needs to fire a projectile of less than 5.6mm at any energy, or else fire a projectile of any size at less than 8 joules.

    So the undefined area comes in when the projectile is exactly 5.6mm, or energy exactly 8 joules?

    [/PEDANTIC]
    Or if it fires water.

    Or fires a projectile of more than 5,6mm at a muzzle energy of more than 8 joules, but by mechanical means and not compressed air (think tennis / cricket ball launchers).
    Sent electronically, thus not signed.

  2. #22
    User
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    False Bay, Cape Town /\/¯¯¯¯¯\/\
    Age
    53
    Posts
    4,172

    Default Re: Big bore air rifles....

    Quote Originally Posted by Skaaphaas View Post
    Or if it fires water.

    Or fires a projectile of more than 5,6mm at a muzzle energy of more than 8 joules, but by mechanical means and not compressed air (think tennis / cricket ball launchers).
    Granted, but the compressed gas part is present in both sets of definitions, so not considering the other alternatives here.

  3. #23
    User
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Boland
    Posts
    8,000

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skaaphaas View Post
    Indeed. To be considered a firearm it needs to fire a projectile bigger than 5,6mm AND at a muzzle energy of more than 8 joules. Ie both requirements have to be met.
    and this, folks, is Formal Logic at work, and I'm disapponted that Mr. Hood misses it. When referring to the NEGATIVE of the statement (i.e. the Act defines "what is an airgun", and Skaaphaas formally deduces "what is NOT an airgun") the OR in the original statements becomes an AND. It is honestly not subject to interpretation, it really is science, and 100% applicable here.

  4. #24

    Default Re: Big bore air rifles....

    If your not worried about being charged. And have no issue sleeping under a flee invested blanket in a room 3mX3m with some other friendly people on a concrete slab and open toilette. With a great aroma. Until you appear in court and charged and sentenced. Feel free to invest in an airrifle which is bigger then a 5.5mm. Remember you will more then likely also be declared unfit to own any other firearms at same time.

    Just curios as to how they enter SA. As surely they must be inspected on entry by Custom officials who has to clear them.

  5. #25
    User
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    238

    Default Re: Big bore air rifles....

    Quote Originally Posted by holdingthezero View Post
    No.

    IF (A) OR (B) is True THEN (C)

    (A) = Cal LESS THAN 5.56mm
    (B) = MV LESS THAN 8 joules
    (C) = Device is Airgun

    Both (A) and (B) must be false in order for the device to NOT be an Airgun.
    AHA! Got it.

    So essentially, we have to separate EVERYTHING ELSE from the definition of an AIRGUN ie ignore paintball markers et al, and consider it within the parameters of EITHER an airgun or a 'firearm', when it comes to legality IRT licensing. Airguns do not need licensing, firearms do.

    Therefore, without any doubt, big bore air rifles CANNOT be considered airguns, as both A and B are false and can under no PRACTICAL instances EVER be true.

  6. #26
    User
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Durban North
    Age
    58
    Posts
    1,721

    Default Re: Big bore air rifles....

    This is really not complicated. 5.5mm or less is an air gun. We are talking air guns here, not other pneumatic devices.
    You don't need to be a lawyer to interpret this.

  7. #27
    Moderator Skaaphaas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Elsewhere
    Posts
    18,528

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Budlust View Post
    AHA! Got it.

    So essentially, we have to separate EVERYTHING ELSE from the definition of an AIRGUN ie ignore paintball markers et al, and consider it within the parameters of EITHER an airgun or a 'firearm', when it comes to legality IRT licensing. Airguns do not need licensing, firearms do.

    Therefore, without any doubt, big bore air rifles CANNOT be considered airguns, as both A and B are false and can under no PRACTICAL instances EVER be true.
    Yes. Although paintball guns, while more than 5,6mm and more than 8 joules, are excluded by name in Section 5 of the FCA.
    Sent electronically, thus not signed.

  8. #28
    User
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    238

    Default Re: Big bore air rifles....

    Quote Originally Posted by Skaaphaas View Post
    Yes. Although paintball guns, while more than 5,6mm and more than 8 joules, are excluded by name in Section 5 of the FCA.
    So excluding all else except the illegality of an unlicensed big bore air rifle -

    Now... how could any defense lawyer explain this away, once their clients are arrested for importing, selling or buying a big-bore air rifle?

    Have any of you that possesses one of these illegal rifles considered your options?

    What's the bet all I will hear are the chirping of crickets....

  9. #29
    Moderator Skaaphaas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Elsewhere
    Posts
    18,528

    Default Re: Big bore air rifles....

    You’re a strange one.

    We’re all in agreement that they need to be licenced as firearms.
    Sent electronically, thus not signed.

  10. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skaaphaas View Post
    You’re a strange one.
    You are far too polite Skaaphaas.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •