Results 1 to 10 of 32
Thread: 223 vs 22-250
-
12-08-2019, 12:42 #1
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Posts
- 395
223 vs 22-250
Hi All
I know this has been asked but this situation is a bit different
1- 1st off all I reload myself so take that into consideration going forward,
2- I am looking for a varminting rifle for jackals, vlakvark etc and even possibly a springbok when I stumble upon one.
3 - The rifle needs to double as a training gun for the family etc.
4- I have several other calibers that will cover bigger hunting etc so no use for 270 etc.
5 -The cost per round is very important as this rifle will be thoroughly used ( possibly most important )
I look forward to hear your inputs
-
12-08-2019, 12:52 #2
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Posts
- 7,181
Re: 223 vs 22-250
So any reason you left out the 222rem.
-
12-08-2019, 13:20 #3
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Posts
- 395
-
12-08-2019, 13:30 #4
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Right next to the pot that needs stirring.
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 2,166
Re: 223 vs 22-250
https://thebiggamehuntingblog.com/22...-vs-220-swift/
Might be some interesting reading for you.
My opinion. I love my .223 but a .22-250 is shooting a bit more flat. That said recoil of a .22-250 is slightly more (thinking about family gun), but not at all hard on recoil. The statement of "used a lot" makes my choice the .223 Its fuel is a bit more cost effective that .223
I have 0 experience with reloading .22-250, but I presume it might be more finicky than .223 with regards to reloading?
As a bonus extra, should it happen that you run out of ammo and reloading time it is not at all difficult to pick up decent .223 factory ammo from any gunshop.
-
12-08-2019, 14:45 #5
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Location
- Stella
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 10,870
-
12-08-2019, 17:08 #6
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Port Elizabeth
- Age
- 55
- Posts
- 11,588
Re: 223 vs 22-250
Taking what you have listed as requirements with emphasis on family and cost per shot, there does not seem to be much question to it - 223 or 222, which ever you find at your price. 22-250 is good for varmints, but if you want to eat your springbuck - 223 - 222.
.22 - 223 - 308 and the average hunter shooter world wide is covered in every way for any average hunt. From 5 year old starter to Eland for dad
-
12-08-2019, 18:59 #7
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Right next to the pot that needs stirring.
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 2,166
Re: 223 vs 22-250
Treeman, ag please man. Just change that list of yours from .308 tot 30-06. Pleaaassee
Thanks
Please gents, don't change this to 308 vs 30-06. Just had to give Treeman some food for thought.
-
12-08-2019, 19:55 #8
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Posts
- 395
-
12-08-2019, 20:13 #9
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- BFN Freestate
- Age
- 45
- Posts
- 12,070
Re: 223 vs 22-250
It’s a strange one this, the requirements does not really tie up with the equipment mentioned.
A 22-250 is a very good jackal cartridge, but it’s not a training cartridge.
A 223 is a very good training cartridge, but it’s not the best jackal cartridge.
Either is good enough for jackal and springbok but neither is generally deemed enough for warthog.
Must say personally I would go 6mm creed or 243 in Howa heavy barrel, if the creeds would just land already.
The 243 is a bit more varminter because of its 1 in 10 twist, the creed is a bit more range rifle because of its 1 in 7.5 twist. Neither will have any mentionable recoil with the heavy barrel and a proper suppressor, that which any varminter have basically.
The 223 will be a hell of a family rifle, but come varminting time you will wish you had something bigger, or faster, or both.
-
12-08-2019, 21:14 #10
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Port Elizabeth
- Age
- 55
- Posts
- 11,588
Re: 223 vs 22-250
What Messor mentions is exact, but I left out other calibers, because of the OP statement - 223/22-250. These, this or that caliber posts always end up with why not or you should and everything fro 17 Fireball to 700 Nitro. I agree a 243 would be more medium everything, not even bothering with a bull barrel, but it was not mentioned in OP.
Bookmarks