Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1

    Default Acceptable price?

    HI All

    I am not so clued up with the prices for these rifles, please tell me what I can put this package up for sale for?

    BRNO .223 ZKK600 (the one with the flat trigger)
    Rudolph 3-9x40 scope looks like a T3 reticle
    mounts with the scope
    Silencer
    1 in 12 twist

    please advise

    thank you

  2. #2

    Default Re: Acceptable price?

    That bad huh...?

  3. #3
    User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pretoria, South Africa
    Age
    34
    Posts
    12,555

    Default Re: Acceptable price?

    LOL. How many shots through the barrel?

  4. #4

    Default Re: Acceptable price?

    Unknown, got the rifle second hand

  5. #5
    User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Pretoria
    Age
    34
    Posts
    843

    Default Re: Acceptable price?

    These days, a 1:9 or 1:8 twist is high fashion, so that's one drawback.

    You could check Gunafrica for a similar rifle, I believe there was one up for sale recently. In my opinion R9-R10k.

  6. #6
    User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pretoria, South Africa
    Age
    34
    Posts
    12,555

    Default Re: Acceptable price?

    Yeah the 1:12 twist really does put it a bit behind the rest. I would also say around R9k, considering it can be anything from 10 to 1,000 rounds down the barrel. It being 1:12 means those bullets were probably not nice and slow, heavy ones, but rather short, fat, fast ones sent out the muzzle with some force, meaning a bit more barrel wear.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Acceptable price?

    The US Army testing seemed to show more wear from longer heavier bullets than shorter and lighter if I recall correctly. Seems friction did play a role and not just powder blasting.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Acceptable price?

    Quote Originally Posted by FNBROWNING View Post
    The US Army testing seemed to show more wear from longer heavier bullets than shorter and lighter if I recall correctly. Seems friction did play a role and not just powder blasting.
    now that's interesting

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Port Elizabeth
    Age
    55
    Posts
    11,588

    Default Re: Acceptable price?

    Quote Originally Posted by FNBROWNING View Post
    The US Army testing seemed to show more wear from longer heavier bullets than shorter and lighter if I recall correctly. Seems friction did play a role and not just powder blasting.

    Quote Originally Posted by Juriew View Post
    now that's interesting
    and incorrect I am pretty certain. Stop think about it - we talk again.

  10. #10
    User
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Boland
    Posts
    8,000

    Default Re: Acceptable price?

    For the ZKK afficionados the addition of a silencer and removal of the front sight is probably a drawback (oh, and it's a -601 short action, not a -600 standard action).

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •