Will you be getting a COVID-19 vaccine?

**Sean KZN** · 23-09-2021, 18:12

Originally Posted by Messor

Thiis virus was so closely related to sars that they named it as such, sars-cov-2.

Then you get the fact that most people just shrugged it off without symptoms.
If you then couple that with the fact that the lab leak theory is looking to be the most likely one, I would say they just looked for the original virus in the bats and modified it a bit.

So, to sum up, I think this virus is nothing new, I think the "new" can be directly linked to stuff they tweaked on the virus.

Modified it a bit alright.
Mutation is like this - CAA ACT AAT TCA CGT AGT GTT
CAA ACT AAT TCA CGT AGT GTG so the last amino acid changed, GTT became GTG

Insert is going to look like this-
CAA ACT AAT TCA CGT AGT CTG (NORMAL)
CAA ACT AAT TCA - CCT CGG CGG GCA - CGT AGT CTG ( NOT Normal)

So that amino acid sequence ( CCT CGG CGG GCA ) just somehow got there, it's not how natural/selection evolution works, it would take many decades to naturally achieve that.

Yes, I agree a bat corona virus was the starting point, the rest was done in a lab.

I don't think it was intentionally created to produce a pandemic or any dramatic outcome such as we are know experiencing.
I would rather suspect that the scientists were dicking around with experiments and unintentionally landed us with this goat fork.

**dammitgriff** · 23-09-2021, 18:39

government scientists!

**Springer** · 23-09-2021, 22:39

Originally Posted by Sean KZN

Modified it a bit alright.
Mutation is like this - CAA ACT AAT TCA CGT AGT GTT
CAA ACT AAT TCA CGT AGT GTG so the last amino acid changed, GTT became GTG

Insert is going to look like this-
CAA ACT AAT TCA CGT AGT CTG (NORMAL)
CAA ACT AAT TCA - CCT CGG CGG GCA - CGT AGT CTG ( NOT Normal)

So that amino acid sequence ( CCT CGG CGG GCA ) just somehow got there, it's not how natural/selection evolution works, it would take many decades to naturally achieve that.

Yes, I agree a bat corona virus was the starting point, the rest was done in a lab.

I don't think it was intentionally created to produce a pandemic or any dramatic outcome such as we are know experiencing.
I would rather suspect that the scientists were dicking around with experiments and unintentionally landed us with this goat fork.

The virus will mutate to survive - previous viruses have showed that they'll do this. But they will become less deadly as they mutate themselves into a corner with a growing resistant population.

**MSW2** · 24-09-2021, 11:06

https://newdeaths.com/2021/09/20/iri...ause-of-death/

**MSW2** · 24-09-2021, 11:14

I found another shop today that is a bit out of my normal area but that I will now support on a regular basis. Not a mask on them, just a friendly smiles. My kind of place.

**SLR** · 24-09-2021, 12:20

Originally Posted by Gleock

What do you make of the higher instances of deaths in the partially vaccinated groups vs. the unvaccinated?

None of them shows a higher death rate after full vaccination

None of the weeks show a higher death rate in the within 21 days of shot vs unvaccinated.

Only one of the weeks in which the after 21 days post shot is higher than the unvaccinated group and the rate isn't specifically tagged as being unreliable due to too little data

At peak infection when there are many more samples the deaths in the pre-21 day, post 21 day and fully vaccinated groups are lower than unvaccinated.

A Chi-square or Tukey test would be more appropriate to compare factors

**treeman** · 24-09-2021, 12:36

If you do not like the stats, just move over to another news group or forum, we now have facts and research to cater for all groups Pro- Anti and Uncertain.
Just search a bit and you will find the answers you Want To Hear

**MSW2** · 24-09-2021, 16:33

**dammitgriff** · 24-09-2021, 17:04

Need? Medicine is profit-driven. The pharmaceutical companies always need to make more money.
The latest webinar is out from the FLCCC.

The FLCCC Weekly Update—September 22, 2021
Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Paul Marik join host Betsy Ashton to provide several important updates.

15:51—Physician/scholars called "fringe doctors"
18:00—MATH+ Hospital Protocol update
20:21—Dr. Paul Marik's new landmark paper: "The Pathophysiology of COVID." The mechanisms of COVID. Why it causes such sickness and death.
23:25—The success of Uttar Pradesh against COVID
34:30—How to counter pharmacists’ refusals to fill prescriptions for ivermectin.

https://odysee.com/@FrontlineCovid19...GzjFDZJ5ozLiVF

**Meteor** · 24-09-2021, 17:11

Originally Posted by SLR

None of them shows a higher death rate after full vaccination

None of the weeks show a higher death rate in the within 21 days of shot vs unvaccinated.

Only one of the weeks in which the after 21 days post shot is higher than the unvaccinated group and the rate isn't specifically tagged as being unreliable due to too little data

At peak infection when there are many more samples the deaths in the pre-21 day, post 21 day and fully vaccinated groups are lower than unvaccinated.

A Chi-square or Tukey test would be more appropriate to compare factors

Sorry dat ek jou nou op die spot sit but I need to hear this straight.

You have (A) an unvaccinated person and (B) an vaccinated person 1-10 days after the jab. No other data.
You must give one Covid. Who and why?