Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Results 31 to 34 of 34
  1. #31
    User
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    Gauteng
    Age
    38
    Posts
    144

    Default Re: Glock 43X opinions

    Quote Originally Posted by mattb View Post
    Waste of time! Its the skim milk of glocks id rather carry a 19 or a 43.
    Surely that would make it 2% Low Fat? the 19 would be full cream and the 43 skim?

    Besides its not up to you to decide if its a waste of time for the user, If it ticks most of the boxes for that person then its the best fit for them.

  2. #32
    Moderator Skaaphaas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Elsewhere
    Posts
    17,881

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mattb View Post
    Waste of time! Its the skim milk of glocks id rather carry a 19 or a 43.
    New here, are you?

    You’ll find it somewhat different to Zuckerberg’s place.

  3. #33
    User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Jhb
    Posts
    3,589

    Default Re: Glock 43X opinions

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark357 View Post
    The minus connector is currently standard on the 43X.
    Only early ones had the other connector
    Mine was one of the early railed versions, and definitely did not have the minus connector.
    Interesting to know. Sadly not long after buying and submitting the application, Glock announced the 43X MOS, pretty miff about that

  4. #34
    User
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    Gauteng
    Age
    38
    Posts
    144

    Default Re: Glock 43X opinions

    Quote Originally Posted by Skaaphaas View Post
    New here, are you?

    You’ll find it somewhat different to Zuckerberg’s place.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •