Results 31 to 40 of 74
Thread: .243 vs 6.5 x 55
-
02-07-2022, 07:50 #31
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Philippolis
- Posts
- 4,785
-
02-07-2022, 08:30 #32
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Boland
- Posts
- 8,011
-
02-07-2022, 13:02 #33
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- Right next to the pot that needs stirring.
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 2,166
Re: .243 vs 6.5 x 55
Very nice! Congratulations.
I hope for my license for my 6.5x55 to be forthcoming in the not do distant future. I have started getting components together for loading ammo. If I were you and finances are fine after paying for the rifle I would also start by buying at least some brass so long. I did not ask at counters for factory ammo (need license first), but brass were scarce and prices differed a lot according to age of stock. When I bought it was the last and only of 2 bags of 100 off Norma brass in the shop.
This I could not verify, but apparently there are still military firearms in NATO countries using 6.5x55 and all sources are going there lately.
-
02-07-2022, 17:48 #34
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Posts
- 37
Re: .243 vs 6.5 x 55
I'm not too clued up on optics. The Burris does seem a bit big for the rifle. Have not decided yet. What would you suggest in the R30k -R35k range for a scope?
The "best" scope i have currently is on the 30-06. A Lynx LX3 2.5-15x50 Sa Hunter.
I was thinking of putting a Burris on the 30-06. Not sure.
-
02-07-2022, 17:59 #35
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Philippolis
- Posts
- 4,785
Re: .243 vs 6.5 x 55
On that rifle, I would mount a Swarovski Z5 2.4-12x50. It is, despite the large objective lens, a light, compact scope with a 1" tube, suited to a hunting rifle. It is suited to both close range bushveld hunting and open country hunting. It has excellent glass, is reliable and will give years of service. If you plan to do longer range shooting, buy the model with the ballistic turret. The scope is a little below your budget but fitting a large heavy scope on that rifle will be counter productive.
The Burris probably have a use but I've never been able to figure out what. It has very poor glass for its price range, have a very narrow field of view and does very poorly in low light conditions or with the sun low and shining in the lenses. I have twice handed clients my rifle to shoot kudu as they could not see clearly through their Burris Eliminators in early morning conditions. So it is not a hunting scope. Neither is it a tactical/target scope.
-
15-07-2022, 09:21 #36
- Join Date
- Nov 2014
- Location
- Garden Route
- Age
- 54
- Posts
- 756
-
15-07-2022, 09:36 #37
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Location
- Eastern Cape
- Posts
- 1,303
Re: .243 vs 6.5 x 55
I can't stand the eliminator. Heavy. Thick aiming points. Don't see a use for it for hunting. Buy a good quality rangefinder and do some practice at distance with you rifle.
-
05-08-2022, 11:55 #38
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Posts
- 37
Re: .243 vs 6.5 x 55
So i came across a FB post of a guy in Australia that was contacted by Sauer and informed that there is a recall on his Sauer 100 Classic 6.5x55. Something to do with the barrel quality.
I contacted Sauer SA and they informed me that my rifle is not affected.
You can view the recall info here
-
07-10-2022, 09:02 #39
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Posts
- 37
Re: .243 vs 6.5 x 55
The time is coming closer to getting my licence and i find myself looking up scopes again.
I asked my local dealer for suggestions.
He mentioned the Swarovski Z5 BT 5-25x52 BT4W and the Z5i 5-25x52.
What do you think?
-
07-10-2022, 11:42 #40
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- Jo'burg.
- Age
- 51
- Posts
- 442
Re: .243 vs 6.5 x 55
WAP, I would think 25magnification is for benchresting monsters, not a classy hunting rig in a classic caliber. A 2-7x37 scope is really all you ever need, but 3-9x40 would compliment the package. Dials and buttons and presets and batteries are not necessary in die veld. Large magnification often tends to create more problems than what it resolves.
Veldskiet is often under 100m, and seldom beyond 250, simply because average shooters like me don't understand wind, and don't practise enough.
Bookmarks