Results 11 to 20 of 22
Thread: Anatomically Correct Targets
-
08-08-2013, 13:45 #11
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Location
- JHB/PTA
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 857
Re: Anatomically Correct Targets
Putting these targets up on a public range with other people there, would not be a good idea... IMHO
-
08-08-2013, 16:58 #12
-
08-08-2013, 17:04 #13
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- JHB North
- Age
- 48
- Posts
- 3,951
-
08-08-2013, 17:07 #14
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- JHB North
- Age
- 48
- Posts
- 3,951
-
08-08-2013, 17:08 #15
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- JHB North
- Age
- 48
- Posts
- 3,951
-
08-08-2013, 17:14 #16
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- JHB North
- Age
- 48
- Posts
- 3,951
-
08-08-2013, 19:24 #17
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Location
- Noord van die biltong gordyn.
- Age
- 57
- Posts
- 9,093
Re: Anatomically Correct Targets
Shot placement on humans, in a defensive scenario, is something that has been debated (and researched) for many years. The problem is, that those that know, are reluctant to share the info, for obvious reasons.
In WW2, the gerries tought their troops to shoot at the centre of mass, of a standing man. That is, on a frontal view, the place where the belt buckle sits. Our own military "Tango" targets (Fig IIB, IIRC) used the same spot as the centre of the scoring area. The reasoning behind this is, that a hit in the pelvis area, will put the BG down quickly. Apparently a shot there feels much worse than a good kick in the groin. It may (or may not) be lethal, but it is immobilising. (Keep in mind, that a hit in the legs, would be deemed sufficient in a military environment.)
Reports by experienced people, such as Jim Cirillo, tend to support the same POA for defensive handgun shooting. Also Jim and others tell of numerous incidents, where head shots were ineffective. (You have to hit a vital organ, to stop a BG, and not all of them have much between the ears...)
An (experienced) SF acquaintance showed me targets, where the heart, upper spine and lower brain (the section controlling motoric funtion) was marked. That was the "scoring" area. He stated that hits in this area were stoppers. Hits outside (i.e. chest area) were not very effective, when using handguns. Remember that the military usually use FMJ ammo.
If we consider the effect of a rifle bullet on game, of roughly the same size as an average human (like say an 80 kg Impala ram), that is placed slightly too far back (i.e. centre of mass, not vitals) the results are well known. Now hit it in the same place with your favourite EDC gun and ammo. The more you hit it, the faster it runs... (It will expire eventually...)
What I'm trying to say is that, if your handgun bullet doesn't hit the "trip-switch", the BG won't stop in his tracks. Where that exact spot is, will be the topic of some heated debates, for quite some time. But what is readily apparent, is that the whole chest area, may be an easy target, but any shots that miss the major blood vessels and spine, are not very likely to stop your BG.
-
12-08-2013, 18:15 #18
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Durban
- Posts
- 916
Re: Anatomically Correct Targets
Sure, no problem tims. My training has shifted to concentrating on center mass shot placement, with some emphasis on speed for multiple consistent hits. Realistically, I think in a stress situation hitting an organ as small as the spinal cord (which is completed encased in bone and has a transverse area of about 1cm2) is not practical. I have a much better chance of hitting the heart or great vessels. For center mass, I define that as a box drawn inward from the midpoint of the clavicles and extending from the sternal notch to the end of the sternum.
Aiming for the brain is also not a good idea IMHO. I have dealt with more than one person shot obliquely with the bullet not entering the cranial vault that contains the brain. There is a lot of skeleton in the face that can deflect bullets too.
The only places that can act as an "off switch" are the brain and spinal cord. Even heart and great vessels will not result in instant hypotension with resultant neurological failure.
All of the above refers to terminal pistol ballistics of course. Higher velocity weapons such as rifles are a different story.. And as I always say - the only things less predictable than bullet paths in humans are the people using them..
lithium
-
12-08-2013, 21:25 #19
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- JHB North
- Age
- 48
- Posts
- 3,951
-
12-08-2013, 22:13 #20
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Western Cape
- Posts
- 3,278
Re: Anatomically Correct Targets
So are we talking mannequins with organs drawn on?
Similar Threads
-
Need Help with Correct Scope
By Melkie in forum General Firearm DiscussionReplies: 16Last Post: 10-02-2013, 06:53 -
P30 correct grip
By Lian in forum HandgunsReplies: 16Last Post: 05-12-2011, 21:46 -
This is the correct mentality.
By FrankH in forum Pro-Gun Supporters and VideosReplies: 0Last Post: 03-10-2010, 21:39
Bookmarks