AK 101 v type 56

**FN_FAN** · 16-10-2014, 20:19

Im aware of the irony of the username asking this question ;) . Im looking to get an AK but im struggling to choose, (wish i didnt have too choose) please share your thought on these two types maybe suggest another variant if you feel its better. Thanks

**ou bobbejaan** · 16-10-2014, 20:25

FN FAL,Lm5

**FN_FAN** · 16-10-2014, 20:27

Im specifically looking at an AK variant at the moment

**540i** · 16-10-2014, 20:29

i would actually go with the type 56 coz the round is more effective overall

**FN_FAN** · 16-10-2014, 20:30

What is the cost comparison per round roughly ?

**Ryno Albrecht** · 16-10-2014, 20:32

Proud owner of a type 56, just awaiting my card!!! they are widely known as some of the BEST AK's around for quality and accuracy etc. they are also the most produced. and what beats the 7.62x39? what you save on a 18k FN you can spend on around 1400 mil surp rounds!

**curious george** · 16-10-2014, 20:32

I own a Type56 and I really really like it!

That said,most will base their choice in terms of .223 vs 7.62 x 39 availability and pricing as a primary consideration.

**FN_FAN** · 16-10-2014, 20:43

I w@nt something i can afford to shoot with regularly , i shoot once a week weather permitting

**Ryno Albrecht** · 16-10-2014, 20:44

Around 5.50 a round of 7.62x39 milsurp, a bit cheaper if you load yourself?

**Scuba Steve** · 16-10-2014, 21:04

I can't compare it to a type 56 but it has a nicer trigger than my Saiga. Performance wise there is nothing in it. Quality wise my russian feels better and the stock doesn't seem so hollow but I'm very I happy I bought the 223 101 to have in addition to my Saiga. I'll never get rid of the Saiga though. As far as ammo goes, currently there isn't much in that either, ammo cost won't be your deciding factor. Go with the caliber you prefer, you won't be sorry either way. I have fondled 2 56's and must say, I'd be pretty chuffed to have an under folder model.