Results 11 to 18 of 18
Thread: EOTech exps3.0 and G33 Magnifier
-
14-05-2024, 18:12 #11
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
- Location
- Dubai
- Posts
- 523
-
14-05-2024, 19:27 #12
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Location
- on the ocean or in the bush
- Posts
- 1,516
Re: EOTech exps3.0 and G33 Magnifier
-
14-05-2024, 20:35 #13
- Join Date
- May 2019
- Posts
- 406
-
15-05-2024, 14:41 #14
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- In the belltower behind you...
- Age
- 45
- Posts
- 9,281
-
15-05-2024, 14:43 #15
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- In the belltower behind you...
- Age
- 45
- Posts
- 9,281
-
15-05-2024, 14:47 #16
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- In the belltower behind you...
- Age
- 45
- Posts
- 9,281
Re: EOTech exps3.0 and G33 Magnifier
-
15-05-2024, 14:59 #17
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Johannesburg
- Posts
- 1,225
-
16-05-2024, 07:11 #18
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Location
- JHB
- Posts
- 2,697
Re: EOTech exps3.0 and G33 Magnifier
I'm fairly sure all Eotech Holographics are still one the ITAR Exception list by name, same as with T1's, certain ACOG's and some of the Razor Range, There are also certain Leupold, Niteforce and that new Sig Scope on the list if my memory serves me correctly.
Which if optics planet does export them, they would require the paperwork and permits to be in place. Not sure how they work for direct export but Brownells used to do the permits from their side, we could need to arrange the SAPS (if applicaple) and ITAC from our side.
Also some confuse ITAR with Dept of Commerce and the different requirements there, and what falls under each jurisdiction.
Also, as a FYI... most US Companies don't direct export because they need to register as an ITAR Registered FFL Exporter, and for most the cost of that and logistic challenges outweigh the benefits.
Bookmarks